<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mehrabian&#039;s Rule: Is 93% of communication really nonverbal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lloyddejongh.com/communication/mehrabians-rule-is-93-of-communication-really-nonverbal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lloyddejongh.com/communication/mehrabians-rule-is-93-of-communication-really-nonverbal</link>
	<description>Sociology, Psychology, Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd De Jongh</title>
		<link>http://lloyddejongh.com/communication/mehrabians-rule-is-93-of-communication-really-nonverbal/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd De Jongh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloyddejongh.com/blog/?p=3#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi Linda! 
 
Glad to have you stop by. I like your partner more already ;)  He&#039;s right about that few of us question received knowledge critically. I want to examine this theme in other blog posts. 
 
I&#039;d be interested to know what does he do for a living. I assume it&#039;s related to training of some nature? 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Linda! </p>
<p>Glad to have you stop by. I like your partner more already <img src='http://lloyddejongh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   He&#039;s right about that few of us question received knowledge critically. I want to examine this theme in other blog posts. </p>
<p>I&#039;d be interested to know what does he do for a living. I assume it&#039;s related to training of some nature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://lloyddejongh.com/communication/mehrabians-rule-is-93-of-communication-really-nonverbal/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloyddejongh.com/blog/?p=3#comment-5</guid>
		<description>A post after my partners heart Lloyd.  He get&#039;s constantly frustrated by the number of presentation skills coaches who just trot the old stuff out without actually have read anything about it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A post after my partners heart Lloyd.  He get&#039;s constantly frustrated by the number of presentation skills coaches who just trot the old stuff out without actually have read anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd De Jongh</title>
		<link>http://lloyddejongh.com/communication/mehrabians-rule-is-93-of-communication-really-nonverbal/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd De Jongh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloyddejongh.com/blog/?p=3#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hi Anil. Thanks for the comment.

What may prove interesting to you, as a master NLPer, is that there is a structure to the myth of the 7%-38%-55% rule that makes it so enduring.

The simple answer is that it&#039;s a &quot;sticky&quot; idea.

In the book Made to Stick, Chip and Dan Heath look at why some ideas become &quot;sticky&quot; and take root, and others fade. There are characterirtics that explain why some ideas persist, even though they are often blatantly ridiculous and false.

The distorted Mehrabian statistic shares three of the characterisics they identify: it&#039;s simple; it&#039;s unexpected; and it&#039;s credible, i.e. it&#039;s based on &quot;scientific research&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anil. Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>What may prove interesting to you, as a master NLPer, is that there is a structure to the myth of the 7%-38%-55% rule that makes it so enduring.</p>
<p>The simple answer is that it&#8217;s a &#8220;sticky&#8221; idea.</p>
<p>In the book Made to Stick, Chip and Dan Heath look at why some ideas become &#8220;sticky&#8221; and take root, and others fade. There are characterirtics that explain why some ideas persist, even though they are often blatantly ridiculous and false.</p>
<p>The distorted Mehrabian statistic shares three of the characterisics they identify: it&#8217;s simple; it&#8217;s unexpected; and it&#8217;s credible, i.e. it&#8217;s based on &#8220;scientific research&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil Dagia</title>
		<link>http://lloyddejongh.com/communication/mehrabians-rule-is-93-of-communication-really-nonverbal/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil Dagia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloyddejongh.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Such a blatant twisting and misinterpretation of the original research. Sometimes I wonder what is the mechanism by which these distorted versions originate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a blatant twisting and misinterpretation of the original research. Sometimes I wonder what is the mechanism by which these distorted versions originate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

